Monday, January 11, 2010

Top ten chemists

Times Higher Education selected "Top Ten Chemists" of the last decade:

Scientist Papers CitationsCitations per paper
1Stephen L. Buchwald Massachusetts Institute of Technology, US Organic chemistry, organic synthesis171 14,822 86.68
2Chad A. Mirkin Northwestern University, US Materials science, nanoscience218 18,531 85.00
3Robert H. Grubbs (Nobel laureate, 2005) California Institute of Technology, US Organic chemistry, catalysis171 13,884 81.19
4Mostafa A. El-Sayed Georgia Institute of Technology, US Physical chemistry, nanoscience112 8,483 75.74
5Younan Xia Washington University, US Biomaterials and nanoscience140 10,520 75.14
6Gregory C. Fu Massachusetts Institute of Technology, US Organic chemistry, asymmetric catalysis108 8,020 74.26
7George M. Whitesides Harvard University, US Bio-organic/physical organic chemistry, materials 241 17,593 73.00
8Michael Grätzel Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Switzerland Photochemistry, solar cells174 11,117 63.89
9Wenbin Lin University of North Carolina, US Supramolecular, materials and catalytic chemistry106 6,685 63.07
10James M. Tour Rice University, US Organic chemistry, nanoscience135 8,472 62.76



More...

Monday, January 4, 2010

Graphene is a Runner-Up in Science Magazine's Breakthrough of the Year

"Graphene takes off" Science magazine says in the last issue of 2009. "Since 2004, when researchers in the United Kingdom discovered a simple way to peel the single-atom-thick sheets of carbon atoms off chunks of graphite, researchers have scrambled to study this ultimate membrane." That UK researchers would be Andre K. Geim and his coworkers (aka "the duct tape gang").

This was only the beginning.

November of 2009 saw that two "separate research groups in New York and New Jersey confirmed that graphene's electrons exhibit the fractional quantum Hall effect, in which electrons act collectively as if they are particles with only a fraction of the charge of an electron." All agree that these physicsy fundamental observations turn to device designs soon.

In May of 2009, "researchers at the University of Texas, Austin, reported that they had made graphene films up to a centimeter square by growing them atop thin copper foils." This would solve the scalability problem of these carbon nanothings. Then "a team at Cornell University modified their technique to grow graphene on silicon wafers."

Not long ago, the graphene transistor was attempted at IBM: "Researchers at IBM reported building graphene transistors that can switch on and off 26 billion times per second, far outpacing conventional silicon devices." This needed an interface technology: "a graphene frequency multiplier for electronic signals, which could lead to new applications in communication and sensing" was made by the folks at MIT.

Graphene keeps dazzling many.
I smell a nobel prize soon.

Here are the links for the curious amongst you:

Xuesong Li et al., "Large-Area Synthesis of High-Quality and Uniform Graphene Films on Copper Foils," Science 324, 1312-1314 (2009)

R. F. Service, "Carbon Sheets an Atom Thick Give Rise to Graphene Dreams," Science 324, 875-877 (2009)

A. K. Geim, "Graphene: Status and Prospects, " Science 324, 1530-1534 (2009)

X. Du et al., "Fractional Quantum Hall Effect and Insulating Phase of Dirac Electrons in Graphene," Nature 462, 192-195 (2009)

K. I. Bolotin et al., "Observation of the Fractional Quantum Hall Effect in Graphene," Nature 462, 196-199 (2009)

Y.-M. Lin et al., "Operation of Graphene Transistors at Gigahertz Frequencies," Nano Letters 9, 422-426 (2009)

Picture from: Nature Asia


More...

Tuesday, October 6, 2009

Chemistry Nobel prize 2009

Another year and another guess..
Gaussling's LoC already has a trio in mind: Harry Gray, George Whitesides and Robert Bergman.

I don't think this is the year of organix though. See my trend post from last year.
It's definitely materials chemistry this time.

So, here're my 2009 predictions:
1. Self assembly: George Whitesides, Jacob Israelachvili, Gero Decher
2. Graphene and nanotubes: Andre Geim, Sumio Iijima
3. Q-dots: Louis Brus, Moungi Bawendi, Paul Alivisatos
4. Nanowires: Charlie Lieber, Peidong Yang, Zhong Lin Wang
5. Mesoporous: Jeffrey Beck, Galen Stucky, Ryong Ryoo


More...

Friday, September 11, 2009

Dip coating CdSe nanorod tips with Gold

Sheldon et al. (from Alivisatos group at UC Berkeley) reported 100,000 fold increase in the conductance of the CdSe nanorods by dipping the ends into gold. The procedure they followed was very simple:

a toluene solution containing gold trichloride (AuCl3, 12 mg, 0.04 mmol), didodecyldimethylammonium bromide (DDAB, 40 mg, 0.08 mmol), and dodecylamine (DDA, 70 mg, 0.37 mmol) was sonicated for 5 min and then added dropwise to a suspension of nanorods stirring under N2. The product was precipitated with methanol
and separated by centrifugation.




More...

Thursday, September 10, 2009

Finding the perfect -faculty job- match

In the latest Nature issue, Julia Boughner put it perfectly:


More...

Monday, August 31, 2009

Gold nanoparticles for lung cancer detection

Nature Nano published an article yesterday by Peng et al. (from Hossam Haick's group at Technion) claiming lung cancer detection by a breathe analyzer based on gold nanoparticles and the resistivity change upon contact with the patient's breathe.

Thin film of thiols with a monolayer of gold particles are wrapped into compartments that are called chemiresistors. The difference in the resistance to the applied current gives away if you have some of the characteristic volatile organic compounds (VOCs).



Truly a fascinating study. I hope it makes through the clinical trials.

For those who want to learn more here is the abstract:
Nature Nanotechnology
Published online: 30 August 2009 | doi:10.1038/nnano.2009.235

Diagnosing lung cancer in exhaled breath using gold nanoparticles

Gang Peng1,2, Ulrike Tisch1,2, Orna Adams1, Meggie Hakim1, Nisrean Shehada1, Yoav Y. Broza1, Salem Billan3, Roxolyana Abdah-Bortnyak3, Abraham Kuten3,4 & Hossam Haick1,2

Abstract

Conventional diagnostic methods for lung cancer1, 2 are unsuitable for widespread screening2, 3 because they are expensive and occasionally miss tumours. Gas chromatography/mass spectrometry studies have shown that several volatile organic compounds, which normally appear at levels of 1–20 ppb in healthy human breath, are elevated to levels between 10 and 100 ppb in lung cancer patients4, 5, 6. Here we show that an array of sensors based on gold nanoparticles can rapidly distinguish the breath of lung cancer patients from the breath of healthy individuals in an atmosphere of high humidity. In combination with solid-phase microextraction7, gas chromatography/mass spectrometry was used to identify 42 volatile organic compounds that represent lung cancer biomarkers. Four of these were used to train and optimize the sensors, demonstrating good agreement between patient and simulated breath samples. Our results show that sensors based on gold nanoparticles could form the basis of an inexpensive and non-invasive diagnostic tool for lung cancer.

Lung cancer accounts for 28% of cancer-related deaths. Approximately 1.3 million people die worldwide every year1, 2. Breath testing is a fast, non-invasive diagnostic method that links specific volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in exhaled breath to medical conditions8, 9. Gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC-MS)4, 6, ion flow tube mass spectrometry10, laser absorption spectrometry11, infrared spectroscopy12, polymer-coated surface acoustic wave sensors5 and coated quartz crystal microbalance13 sensors have been used for this purpose. However, these techniques are expensive, slow, require complex instruments and, furthermore, require pre-concentration of the biomarkers (that is, treating the biomarkers by a process to increase the relative concentration of the biomarkers to a level that can be detected by the specific technique) to improve detection.

Here, we report a simple, inexpensive, portable sensing technology to distinguish the breath of lung cancer patients from healthy subjects without the need to pre-treat the exhaled breath in any way (see also refs 14–16 for the diagnosis of lung cancer by sensing technology that is based on arrays of polymer/carbon black sensors). Our study consisted of four phases and included volunteers aged 28–60 years. Samples were collected from 56 healthy controls and 40 lung cancer patients after clinical diagnosis using conventional methods and before chemotherapy or other treatment. The clinical characteristics of the volunteers are listed in Supplementary Tables S1 and S2.


More...

Thursday, March 26, 2009

Muscle like carbon nanotubes

Aliev et al. (from Baughman lab at UT Dallas) reported artificial muscles from carbon nanotubes. When applied voltage (5 kV), carbon nanotubes expanded in the same direction (see Figure). What's even more exciting is that they observed almost no change when they swinged at temperatures between 80 K and 1500 K! And the tubes are found to diffract light in a certain direction, opening up optical applications. Cool stuff.




More...

Monday, March 9, 2009

Heartland Institute challenges global warming claims




Steve Ralls calls it "Change, coming from the heartland".

Newsblaze caught a good point:"EU President Says Environmentalists Want to Command Human Behavior".


More...

Tuesday, February 24, 2009

Does open access increase scientific involvement?

If you spent your entire life on promoting "Open Access" for academic journals, you won't like this.

Contrary to the common belief, James Evans and Jacob Reimer reports that the effect of free access to the increase in citations from poor countries is more modest than you think, only 8%. Some of their conclusions like this one are even more troubling for open access lovers: "most researchers (even in the developing world - nt) rely on institutional subscriptions".

Maybe this quote from the study answers your questions that start with "why": "The influence of OA was more than twice as strong in the developing world but was less apparent in the very poorest countries where electronic access is limited".


More...

Monday, February 23, 2009

New form of Boron and Conan O'Brien

It's not that Boron has only four true crystal structures that makes it interesting, the real deal is at the fact that Boron is very hard to predict. It disobeys all the rules of periodic table. Artem Oganov from State University of New York at Stony Brook discovered a never observed allotrope of boron just recently and this may not be the last one.

Ken Chang wrote about this and mistakenly mentioned three forms not including the study he was writing about. He corrected it soon after but it was long enough to get caught by Conan O'Brien.

Check out the video on Conan's take on the matter.


More...

Wednesday, February 11, 2009

8 nm Au Ag nano alloys for CO oxidation

Dr. Sun did it again!
There wasn't an easy way to make gold and silver nano scale alloys (especially at the sizes of 8-9 nm) until Dr. Shouheng Sun and Dr. Chao Wang's work appeared in chemistry of materials just yesterday. The method shines with its simplicty: one pot, mix silver nitrate (AgNO3) with oleylamine, heat it to 100 oC, inject HAuCl4, heat more at 120 oC for 30 more minutes. How simpler can it get? Results are stunning (see the figure); you can also tune the composition to your taste. The only issue is they couldn't prove that these alloys survive CO oxidation without any sintering. I think this is the reason they published a communication. Let's wait for the fully loaded beauty.


More...

Wednesday, January 28, 2009

Growth of PS beads on gold nanocrystals

Ohnuma et al. (Xia group at Washington U. St. Louis) presents a beautiful way of dressing up gold nanocrystals with polystyrene (PS) polymer. They start the polymerization and then introduce the gold (50 nm) nanocrystals at a magic time, 2 minutes after the initiation. 30 minutes had 50 % success for gold embedding and 0 minutes had multiple gold cores in PS particles (in all cases PS size was around 300 nm with somewhat round shape). I wonder if plasmonic resonance played a role in the growth of the PS. As they promised to publish a mechanistic paper, we'll have to wait.


More...

Wednesday, December 10, 2008

Modifying hirsch index and impact factor for graduate students and untenured: Academic Impact Index (AII)

Hirsch index seems to be working better for senior or semi-senior professors. The untenured and yet to be graduated (e.g. grad students) are not easy to track in h-index. In other words, h-index is not that sensitive below 5.

Here's a suggestion for an academic impact index (AII):

Your AII = Total [(journal impact factor + times cited)x n]

n=1 if you are not the first, second or corresponding author
n=1.5 if you are the second author
n=2 if you are the first and/or corresponding author

For example, the 5th year chemistry graduate student Jack Sparrow has 3 journal papers (peer reviewed). His Chemistry of Materials paper has 4 citations, Advanced Materials has 11 and JACS (second author) has none because it's just come out.

His AII = (4.883 + 4)x2 + (8.191 + 11)x2 + (7.885 + 0)x1.5 = 67.976 = 68

So Mr. Sparrow's Academic Impact Index (AII) is 68.

Notes:
1. If there is no data for a journal's impact factor then put "0" for impact factor.

Advantages of this method:
1. Everything counts
2. The level of authorship matters (i.e. first, second or corresponding)
3. The journal you are publishing in is important
4. Any newly published papers have an immediate impact on your score


More...

Monday, November 24, 2008

CO2 activation by Copper (I) complexes

Ohishi et al. (from Hou group at Riken Research, Japan) reported facile CO2 activation by CuCl and N-heterocyclic carbene ligands. Organoboron complexes get the insertion of the CO2 and produce carboxylic acid counterpart by loosing the boron group. Their method is very efficient (over %90 conversion most cases) and the other functional groups on the structure seems little or not affected. The only downside is that you have to use little more than stochiometric (or in some cases twice as much) base (tBuOK) and similar amounts of acid (HCl) to get the reaction going.
Good job though.


More...

Tuesday, November 18, 2008

Jennifer Love from british columbia on catalysis

She talked about hydrosulfurization and Pt asissted C-F activation. Very exciting stuff and an excellent speaker I must say.


More...

Monday, November 10, 2008

Nobel Laurate Yuan T. Lee's talk


More...

Tuesday, November 4, 2008

Center for Environmental Implications of Nanotechnology

UCSB's Arturo Keller introduced the Center for Environmental Implications of Nanotechnology (CEIN). This 25 million dollar center is funded by NSF and will bring a significant contribution to nano toxicology.


More...

Thursday, October 23, 2008

Low Temperature SWNT by Sakthi Kumar

Imagine that you can synthesize single wall carbon nanotubes at 280 oC! That's precisely what dr. Sakthi Kumar from toyo university, Japan did. They used CoTPP and plasma evaporation. They patented all right in 2006 but they're still trying hard to convince Nature Nanotechnology editors to be accepted for a publication. What a drag. I would send it to JACS or something.


More...

Thursday, October 16, 2008

Open call to Nobel Foundation to establish a Nobel prize in Biology

Alfred Nobel (1833-1896)Image via WikipediaThe 2008 Nobel Chemistry prize has gone to another biological discovery.

Isn't it already time for a Nobel prize in Biology (or Molecular Biology)?

How long will the chemists suffer to see their prizes going to their biologist friends?

Is it fair that Chemistry, Physics, Medicine has their prizes and Biology not?

Who decides to establish another Nobel prize?

Stop this torture! Free the chemists!

UPDATE: It seems like I am not alone.


More...

Tuesday, October 14, 2008

World's top universities by Times Higher Education

2007 RANK 2006 RANK NAME COUNTRY PEER REVIEW SCORE EMPLOYER REVIEW SCORE STAFF/STUDENT SCORE CITATIONS/STAFF SCORE INTERNATIONAL STAFF SCORE INTERNATIONAL STUDENT SCORE OVERAL SCORE
1 1 Harvard University US 100 100 96 100 87 81 100
2 2= Yale University US 100 100 100 98 89 71 99.8
3 2= University of Cambridge UK 100 100 99 89 98 95 99.5
4 2= University of Oxford UK 100 100 100 85 96 96 98.9
5 7= California Institute of Technology US 100 74 98 100 100 93 98.6
6 5 Imperial College London UK 99 100 100 83 98 100 98.4
7 9 University College London UK 96 99 100 89 96 100 98.1
8 7= University of Chicago US 100 99 98 91 78 83 98.0
9 10 Massachusetts Institute of Technology US 100 100 90 100 33 94 96.7
10 11 Columbia University US 100 99 98 94 29 89 96.3
11 14 University of Pennsylvania US 97 98 88 99 83 79 96.1
12 6 Princeton University US 100 98 75 100 91 82 95.7
13= 13 Duke University US 97 98 100 94 30 66 94.4
13= 15 Johns Hopkins University US 99 78 100 100 30 68 94.4
15 20= Cornell University US 100 99 90 96 28 76 94.3
16 16 Australian National University Australia 100 93 82 74 99 91 92.0
17 19 Stanford University US 100 100 67 100 26 87 91.2
18 38= University of Michigan US 99 99 85 84 59 51 91.0
19 17 University of Tokyo Japan 100 94 98 78 27 40 90.0
20 12 McGill University Canada 100 97 99 51 62 95 89.7.

More...


More...